17 04 2018 John – Airlines and personal information – On Air with Paul

Paul:
Let’s go to John who has got a question about airlines and personal information.

John:
Good morning, David and Paul. I just got back from an overseas trip where an incident happened. One passenger and I mistook each other’s check in luggage. So in order for him to reach me to get his luggage back he got all my personal information from the airline: my passport number, my date of birth, even my picture. In order to reach me, he published all the information on the website.

DW:
So you took someone’s luggage by mistake?

John:
Yes, and he took mine.

DW:
That’s happened to me once. Someone else took our bag at Qantas, at the airport, and they were fantastic they actually rang the other passenger and they came back.

John:
I rang the airline as well at the time. I didn’t find the other party’s information so I stopped getting their personal information.

DW:
The privacy rules, John, will depend upon the law that applies to the airline in question. So if you were transiting Hong Kong, or your bag went missing in Hong Kong then the answer is it would be Hong Kong law and Hong Kong privacy law that would apply.

It’s going to be a mixture of questions of the airline. If you were flying an Australian based airline and you bought your ticket in Australia your privacy would be governed by Australian rules.

John:
No, it was an international airline.

DW:
They might be bound by the information they collect here from you.

This is the issue that arises in privacy, because you reach an agreement with an Australian company and they say look you’ve got to be aware that we’re going to send your data to another country for the purpose of doing work on it, processing it, storing it whatever, and once your data leaves Australia the Australian laws don’t apply to the data. So if your data’s gone to the Philippines or to India or to somewhere else then your data will be dealt with there according to the rules that apply to the data where it is.

John:
Fair enough. But how about the responsibility of the individual who got the information and published online.

DW:
Well they’re not covered by the privacy principles or the privacy rules. I understand the complaint against the airline. My view is they handed out too much information because how did they know you had the bag?

John:
Because there are two bags missing.

DW:
So the assumption was it was yours, you had it.

John:
Yes.

Paul:
Okay, John thanks very much for your call.

Recent radio

24 04 2018 Margaret in Ringwood – Improvement costs to a life tenancy property – On Air with Jon Faine

My husband died 21 years ago. We held the property as joint proprietors for our life, then it went to tenants in common upon the death of my husband and I have a life tenancy over his share.

24 04 2018 Marianne in Taylors Lake – Access to a neighbour’s property to check your phone line – On Air with Jon Faine

I’m just calling regarding denial of access. I have been refused, for myself and my telecommunications technician to check the integrity of a phone line or phone cord, that services landline and internet, and that runs on the side of a brick wall that is situated on a property line.

24 04 2018 David in Mt Waverley – Amending a title to match surveying – On Air with Jon Faine

I’m really ringing up on behalf of my son who bought an inner city property three to four years ago. He’s had plans approved for an extension and in the process, he’s had the land surveyor come out.

Scroll to Top